@0xabad1dea 🤯that sentence doesn't logic for me.
I'm not [...] so I'm conducting harassment. No way you meant to say that, right?
@0xabad1dea 🤯that sentence doesn't logic for me.
I'm not [...] so I'm conducting harassment. No way you meant to say that, right?
@0xabad1dea 🤯that sentence doesn't logic for me.
I'm not [...] so I'm conducting harassment. No way you meant to say that, right?
@iwein please apply the implied frame “if you claim to be ‘conducting a social experiment’ to justify your behavior”
@0xabad1dea got it. That was really helpful btw, thx.
(I get stuck on things like this _badly_ and I appreciate that's not your problem to solve)
🙇♀️
@0xabad1dea The blog post read like the work of a nepobaby who has never been held accountable for anything and who believes in magic.
@0xabad1dea All research involving human subjects, whether psycological or medical has human testing standards. Handy for stupidity like that.
@0xabad1dea
also, if you're not keeping records of what's happening...
@0xabad1dea Even with the caveats, those two things are not necessarily mutually exclusive.