Prompted by both a tragic study on personality phrenology I saw today and by my current book revisions, I have a question
Where have you seen "individual" explanations given for software development outcomes when the REAL driver was group work?
E.g., heroes get the credit when the thing was really a team effort? Or people thinking your best skill is coding fast alone when really it's about collaboration? Any stories like that would be welcome as I chew on this
@[email protected] I've had the unfortunate experience of working in a team where the tech lead (who's priority on paper was managing, not coding) used this position to "get stuff done" by lobbing low quality work over the wall and relying on the teams under him to tidy it up, fix the bugs, add the tests, etc.
I found out via an irate bug report from a customer one Monday morning that he had released a whole new feature over the weekend without code review (because, well, no one else was online...), and I was now responsible for second line support on it.