Discussion
@[email protected] it seems a mostly US thing? As a Brit, I was slightly horrified at the number of US services that offered, or even suggested I paid more for, the option to have a robot phone me rather than send an email or text. But... why? Even if I was blind, I'd trust my text to speech over an auto dialer.
@[email protected] @[email protected] I think in both cases there's also a practicality aspect: having taught tech skills to primary school children I can tell you that a sizeable percentage (verging on a majority) have at least some access to devices where they are logged in as one of their parents to at least some services. More than 10% so far have devices they carry with them that are logged into a parents email account, meaning they can (if they know how) reset the password on most online services and then delete the evidence of having done so.
Assuming my experience isn't unusual, and I have no reason to believe it is, I cannot see any way to target restrictions by age that isn't nonsense; a sizeable proportion of children are browsing the internet with completely legitimate 'adult' accounts out of a combination of convenience and lack of knowledge already.
@[email protected] @[email protected] ...I think this is, unfortunately, the second time in as many days I've been wanting the "dislike - but agree" button.
@[email protected] "Give me money for my AI removal AI" is right up there on the offensively brazen stakes I have to admit.
@[email protected] @[email protected] Also, if a slight aside, I'd argue that from a formal point of view if finding out more information changes the answer you can't really claim you had complete information. That's more of a 'my Bayesian priors make it seem most likely that' territory 😊
@[email protected] @[email protected] Hmm. My turn to be on the "other" side: to claim something is true in a formal mathematical sense while not holding complete information seems straight up incorrect to me, even though I have no issue with it being used for "best guess with the information available" in general conversation.
@[email protected] @[email protected] Fair. I suppose I associate a level of intent with honesty, while (maths + programming background) I use true/false in a formal sense all the time. I wouldn't claim to be the one true arbiter of correct use of true however, and I would disagree with anyone claiming that the statement was a lie regardless of whether you consider it 'true'.
@[email protected] @[email protected] Honest, but not true? Covers a surprisingly wide range of well meaning communication, especially when you start taking unconscious bias into account.
This is something that has bothered me for a long time. How did we end up in a timeline where we're all continually agreeing to contracts that are allowed to change their own terms and conditions, even while everybody agrees huge swathes of them are unenforceable on either party? We've achieved all of the paperwork with none of the benefits.
@[email protected] @[email protected] The weirdest part of the whole thing is that based on your longer description the headline was really an uncommonly clear and accurate description of the study. And yes, interesting study idea even if a somewhat unsurprising and depressing result.
@[email protected] What @[email protected] said - I was going to respond with something much more angry and sarcastic, but it's probably more important to reinforce there's people out there who think what you're doing is really valuable, and that I personally have appreciated the couple of occasions you've directly pointed out I'd mis- or partially understood something from your field of expertise.
Also: he was being an arse. Sorry that happened to you 😞
@[email protected] @[email protected] The BBC nailed this as a children's show decades ago: "Maid Marian and her Merry Men"
I didn't realise at first it was SF rather than real SF news until I got to the bit where the SF member at the SF competition yelled "Orange! Rising Dragon Fist!" and punched his opponent out of SF.
@[email protected] On the third hand, playing with squirty cream is fun. This has very little to do with how good the strawberries taste, but is also a truism of life worth bearing in mind
@[email protected] This, also, is true. That said, while really good strawberries are really good, this technique has the advantage of helping okay strawberries also taste really good 😊
Like #strawberries but don't like/can't eat cream? One Italian alternative is to roughly chop them (halves or quarters is fine unless you have huge strawberries) and marinate them for at least an hour in lemon juice and sugar (about 10 grams sugar + the juice of one lemon per 500g/1lb of strawberries).
They'll keep in the fridge overnight, and you can even box them up to take to places where you don't have access to a fridge - you will need a spoon to eat them with though.
(Apparently today is @mavnn posts about food day)
@[email protected] @[email protected] I vaguely follow the competitive Street Fighter scene to add an extra one to the list. It feels like it must be possible to write ambiguous sentences with several of them, with bonus points for the more you fit in while still being plausibly coherent.
@[email protected] It's always the simple sounding ideas that sound appealing. Remove management, meritocracy, unlimited annual leave... it's almost like life is a little more complicated than most of us really want to engage with.
Especially because it's always easier to assume things are simple if the problems aren't happening to you.
Of course, it's even more frustrating when we then avoid the simple things that do actually have an evidential basis. Working less than ~35 hours a week is long term more productive? Giving homeless people homes is a (comparatively) cheap and effective way of dealing of dealing with homelessness? Madness! The real world can't possible work like that!
Getting slightly hotter here, so time for my not too bad, not too slow #coldbrew #coffee.
Put coffee in aeropress over your mug (filter down). Tip in cold water, about enough to actually fill your mug. Stir really well (coffee grindings do not like mixing into the cold water). Put press on and set a timer for ~15 mins; some coffee will drip through but that's fine, in fact that's how you normally make cold brew. When the timer goes or you get impatient, skip the rest of the several hours cold brew normally takes and press the coffee. Done.
Install bonfire.mavnn.eu
Get the full app experience
