@JdeBP I have no idea what you're trying to say.
As I pointed out in that post, there's a whole bunch of well-known people in the software world in there simply by dint of their names being attached to the copyright licences of various pieces of free/open source softwares. (Hyperlink to document in that post.)
And unlike in other cases, the USADOJ people didn't go through that document and black out the e-mail addresses.
Apparently I am mentioned (just once) in the Epstein Files.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01755942.pdf
(Spoiler: it's a deeply nerdy infosec discussion which name-checks one of my short stories. It doesn't even mention Epstein or Maxwell, let alone the Tangerine Shitgibbon or anything remotely incriminating.)
You would have had your full name and unredacted e-mail address if only you had licenced some free/open source software. (-:
Another non-political tid-bit from the #EpsteinFiles.
A whole load of famous software developers, from Paul Vixie and Bram Moolenaar through Matthew Dillon and Theo de Raadt to a positive laundry list of Perl module developers, all get search hits because someone decided to make a 205-page collection of free software/open source copyright licences.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00289243.pdf
I expect some very bored person one day to make a statistical analysis of how many of each kind of licence is in there.
